Respondents with a view in the decision-making process were more optimistic, while those participating in decision making were more conservative. Key decision makers scored in between, combining personal knowledge; perspective, and concerns about business outlook, inventories, and pricing and how they feel markets will develop. Component manufacturers, distribution / logistics, and semiconductor respondents were the least optimistic. Respondents are most concerned about current inventories and future profits.
One year past the end of the great recession and the outlook for the electronics supply chain has improved significantly in most areas. The survey of the electronics supply chain also points to even higher hopes for the second half of 2011. However, there is concern about current prices increasing and for profit levels in the second half of 2011.
Unlike other electronics industry surveys that cite a large organizational spend of materials cost of goods sold (MCOGS), this survey provides a balanced view from a large sample that is representative of the entire supply chain.
This survey gathered opinions from 412 executives from the supply chain, including 179 key decision makers and a further 154 participants in the decision-making process of their organizations.
This large industry survey of senior decision makers on the electronics supply chain is representative across types of organizations and end-markets active in the supply chain.
Because of this large sample, this survey provides a balanced, nuanced view into the supply chain instead of a limited view of a few respondents.
This survey drills deep into the organizations where opinions are formed and decisions are made.
Fear, uncertainty, and doubt still reign in regards to the supply chain shocks resulting from the earthquake and tsunami in Japan.
It appears this disruption was on the minds of our respondents as they thought about the current environment but most did not appear to think the impact would last into the second half of 2011.
However, automotive industry respondents were among the most positive in their outlook, even though they faced the most immediate impact in the supply chain. Also, despite the severity of the crises, the majority of respondents did not feel inventories would be greatly affected.
As seen in previous years, location within the supply chain and role regarding the decision-making process influences opinions. Primary markets and type of company have some relationship to the answers provided, even if this does not always make sense.
Among the most optimistic were PC, server, and automotive companies, as well as electronics OEMs, and electronics manufacturing services (EMS) firms and original design manufacturers (ODM). Least optimistic were networking and telecommunication respondents. (EMS / ODM firms: Submit your company to the EMS Resources Directory)
The Survey
VentureOutsource.com’s Electronics Supply Chain Business Outlook Survey for spring 2011 ran for approximately five (5) weeks ending May 1, 2011 and generated responses from 412 people. Respondents were asked 12 questions regarding their expectations about the current and future business environment: employment, business volume, and product pricing.
The survey was sponsored by Digi-Key (www.digi-key.com) one of the world’s fastest growing distributors of electronics components.
Survey respondents were asked to rate their views on these questions on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being the most negative and 10 for the most optimistic response). VentureOutsource.com conducted a similar survey in Q1 2010 asking the same basic 12 questions. (View Q1 2010 survey results)
This survey on the state of the electronics supply chain gathered opinions from 412 respondents from throughout the supply chain and from different market segments.
Tables 1, 2 and 3 show the number of respondents by their type of company versus three other demographic categories.
Table 1
Responses by company type and product area / market segment
More than half of the respondents worked for electronics OEM or EMS / ODM companies. The next largest groups of respondents were from semiconductor firms. Electronics equipment and component manufacturers generated a combined 21% of respondents. The smallest number of respondents, 25, came from distribution or logistics firms.
Survey responses were heavily weighted toward industrial and consumer device parts of the electronics supply chain, each with just over 25% of respondents.
Military / aerospace / avionics, server and personal computing, and telecommunications segments also contributed between 10-12% of responses. The automotive electronics, medical, and networking segments rounded out the respondents.
Table 2
Responses by company type and decision-making role
While key decision makers continue to account for over 40% of respondents, similar to the last survey, more respondents reported only a view into the decision-making process.
Key decision makers accounted for 43% of respondents, while participants in the decision-making process accounted for 37%. The remaining respondents held a view into the decision-making process. This composition held across most of the company types.
Two standouts were component manufacturers and EMS / ODMs. In component manufacturing, half of all respondents had a role in the decision-making process, but were not key decision makers. In the EMS / ODM space more than half of all respondents were key decision makers.
80% of survey respondents were actively engaged in purchasing, sales, and operational decision making, thus providing a balanced view of the current and future business outlook in these supply chains.
Unlike other electronics industry studies relying on a limited number of people with high dollar levels of spending, this survey balances respondents from different levels within organizations to achieve a nuanced and balanced view of the supply chain.
Top decision makers rely on their organizations to gather insights into purchasing requirements, sales opportunities, material needs, logistics, and other intelligence needed for purchasing decisions. In fact, in most organizations, decision making is dispersed throughout the organization.
Studying just one senior executive in an organization leaves one with just the personal views and biases of that one person.
Worst, relying on a small set of respondents, whose opinions you capture for just the moment in which they are engaged with a survey instrument, may lead to false assumptions.
To understand supply chains requires respondents throughout organizations that are actively involved in the relationships that unite companies.
With 412 respondents, 80% of whom are actively engaged in purchasing, sales, and operational decision making, this survey has been designed to provide a balanced view of the current and future business outlook in these supply chains.
Table 3
Responses by company type and business level
Seven out of ten respondents said they were answering for their whole company, not just at the level of a business unit. This is up from our last survey. Electronics equipment manufacturing had a higher share of respondents answering just for their business unit.
On the other hand, 77% of EMS / ODM respondents indicated they were answering for their whole company.
Figure 1
Responses by level of decision making
Survey results
As stated above, the survey consisted of twelve core questions asking respondents for their opinions on multiple aspects of the current and future business environment, in regards to the electronics supply chain, from either selling into, or purchasing from, the supply chain.
For each of these core questions, respondents were asked to provide their opinion on a scale of from one to ten, where one was the most negative response and ten the most positive.
From these 12 core questions asked in the survey, three indices were formed to summarize respondent attitudes toward the state of the electronics supply chain and will be examined in detail below. The indices are:
- Current Index: The average of each of the respondent’s scores for their current outlook regarding the economic situation, employment, inventory levels, business volume, and prices.
- Future Index: The average of each of the respondent’s scores for their expectations regarding the economic situation, employment, business volume, and profits.
- Overall Index: The average of the two indices above.
The survey results show the outlook for the electronics supply chain is improving, a year into the recovery from the great recession, as shown in Figure 2. Respondents view the current business environment with optimism, responding on average with a 5.8 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most favorable. This score is 9% higher than the score seen in last year’s survey.
The supply chain shocks resulting from the earthquake and tsunami in Japan were obviously weighing down this response. A contributing factor for the still muted response is probably the normal seasonality in the first half of the year that is a constant factor in the supply chain. Another issue weighing on the supply chain is likely how the media tablet explosion will impact the PC market.
Figure 2
Electronics Supply Chain Business Outlook, 2010 versus 2011
Regarding the future, the survey indicates high expectations for the second half of 2011, with an average score of 6.1. While last year, weighed down with an expected slowdown in business activity across the supply chain following the post-recovery jump seen in the first half of 2010, the survey only showed a 3% increase of the Future Index over the Current Index.
In 2011, the optimism for the second half showed a 6% increase in the Future over the Current Index. This optimism may be tied to a view of the supply chain moving beyond the tragedy in Japan but may also be tied to expectations for future opportunities related to the growth mobile systems, cloud computing, and upcoming trade shows that will launch products for the second half of the year.
One interesting point is there is a consistent view if we look at responses by the role in the decision-making process.
Respondents with only a view in the decision-making process tended to provide more optimistic scores, while those that participated in the decision-making process tended to be more conservative.
Key decision makers tended to score between these two extremes, offering a more balanced view on the supply chain, combining their own knowledge, perspective, and concerns about how markets will develop.
When looking at current versus future outlooks, we see respondents with only a view into the process had only an average of a 3% increase in the Future Index outlook versus the Current Index.
Participants in the decision-making process were more optimistic, increasing their score by 5.6%. Key decision makers were the most optimistic regarding the future, with an average increase between the current and future indices of 6.4%. This bodes well for the second half of 2011.
Figure 3
Supply chain outlook by decision-making role
Examining the Overall Index by company type and product area, Figure 4, we can see how a respondent’s location in the supply chain is influencing their outlook, even if it does not always make sense. Respondents primarily focused on the PC, server, and automotive markets held the highest opinions, on average.
These respondents averaged 6.2, 6.2, and 6.1, respectively, compared to an overall average of 5.9. This can make sense, since servers have enjoyed strong demand from corporate replacement cycles and the growth of cloud computing.
PCs remain a large part of the market and have done well following the recession.
Get list of EMS manufacturers for your requirements (Its free)
Save time and money. Find quality EMS manufacturers. Fast. Venture Outsource has a massive, global database of contract electronic design and manufacturing capabilities. Speak with a Provider Advisor.
“Was able to very quickly find details on the important elements of setting up EMS and ODM partnerships, talked with an advisor for personalized info on quality providers matching our requirements while getting up to speed quickly about the industry and connect with key staff from like-minded companies and potential partners. Great resource.”
— Jeff Treuhaft, Sr. Vice President, Fusion-IO
Advisors tell you matches we find for your needs, answer your questions and, can share EMS industry knowledge specific to your industries and markets.
